Jump to content
Kate Bush Forum
Sign in to follow this  
  • entries
    49
  • comments
    103
  • views
    5,113

"pop Culture Will Never Be Low Brow"

Sign in to follow this  
Jayne Dullahan

443 views

It began last fall. It's escalated since. Now even my students know I have a seriously academic fascination with not one, but TWO culturally distinct pop phenomena: Kate Bush and Lady Gaga. You may be gasping and sputtering. You may be nodding. Distinctive as they are, Kate and Gaga have aesthetic similarities that appeal very much to the poet voyeur in me, and if Kate Bush ever came to town, you can bet I'd fork over any amount of cash to see it; Gaga IS coming to town and I've forked over a reasonable amount of cash for kick-ass seats to a concert I will doubtless be one of the oldest people attending (that is, of those not accompanying minors). I am not the lone academic persona with an eye on Gaga. She's captured even the eyes of the legitimately snobby "New Yorker" and I doubt we'll have to wait long before some cultural theorist publishes on her work.

As I said, Kate and Gaga are quite different. But how they work is quite similar. They both managed to do something that few do, and that is to mostly remain in control of their production. One of my favorite distractions in graduate school was Gaffaweb, in particular the logs from the era of "The Dreaming," where one gets the distinct impression that Kate Bush and her brothers and their friends were basically indulging in artistic projects they'd been dreaming of doing anyway, just now there was also an audience for it. Not so different the "Haus of Gaga". The twist is that the main sujet is the figure of fame and a vested interest in embracing what is usually dismissed and denigrated as "pop culture". Lady Gaga is not an uncritical observer or devotee of fame--she is a pastiche of fame, a burlesque act lampooning its own cause celebre, and it just keeps getting more fun to watch.

The video for "Bad Romance," the lead single from her not-yet-released album "The Fame Monster," is the work of someone with big ideas who finally has the resources to realize them; as ever tongue in cheek, the vampire imagery--from the Monster capsule caskets in the cellar to the grimacing bat headdress and the enhanced spines, ribs and eyes--is mostly IN Lady Gaga, suggesting much of what transpires is within her grasp. She is her own victim and savior. The shoes, masks, unabashed sexuality of her act got her into this mess (in this case sold off in an auction to the Russian mafia; in "Paparazzi" pushed off a balcony by her Swedish "boyfriend") and in the end it is this very camp that saves her, as she fortunately has a bra that is also a flamethrower--a great stage prop but it turns out also a handy item for destroying potential rapists. As she stands defiantly in front of the raging flames, draped in a stunning faux polar bear wrap and made up to high heaven, I can't help but get the feeling the artist Gaga (as opposed to the fictional character Gaga) is smirking as the flames blow absurdly higher, having created this artwork, at once beautiful and ridiculous, thoroughly enjoyable and collaborative. Not unlike Kate darting her eyes back and forth, you know, in case any demons are lurking off camera.

Silent film actress Louise Brooks made a career out of her own failure. From bad personal and professional decisions to a self-devouring aura, Louise Brooks was a victim of her own Fame Monster, but managed to reforge a legacy reflecting on and embracing that failure. Lady Gaga's project takes all this from a distance Brooks didn't have at the time she was creating her hot mess and parades it in grand parody up and down the catwalk. The obvious pastiche element prevents it from being just another pathetic fashion victim or witless slave to celebrity; Lady Gaga is having fun with this object called fame, and the act exudes legitimacy in its lack of pettiness or agenda. Underneath the direction of the Disco Stick is a thoroughly critical, non-partisan examination of every aspect of "Fame", rife with material to analyse for those who are given to analysis and just fun to dance to for everyone else. Walter Benjamin wrote of Charles Baudelaire, "The depiction of the confused is not the same thing as a confused depiction." Many pop acts are confused depictions; Gaga gives a thoroughly calculated depiction of the confused. It's fabulous, it's cerebral, it's pop. And while I don't entirely agree that pop culture will never be low brow, I do absolutely agree that Lady Gaga's conception of pop culture is not low brow. And I can't wait for "Monster Ball." Maybe I'll go in my Academic Robes and Hood...and 6 inch platform heels...

Sign in to follow this  


3 Comments


Recommended Comments

Thanks for the interesting commentary.

I 'm sure what your students say is

"All we hear is

Lady Gaga

La-dy Ga-Ga"

It is supposed to be like Queen's "Radio Gaga" wink.gif

People spend alot of time attacking her. They even wonder if she is a Hermaphrodite. Who cares! She makes good music. I seem to remember somewhere there was a press article describing Kate as androgenous. People are always going to put down other people's tastes...it has happened on the KBF even.

Remember, Loise Brooks was what caused the term "IT girl" to be invented. So, we haven't come a long way.., people attack women artists more than men, especially when their sexuality is not controlled by men.

Greg

Share this comment


Link to comment

Your comparison of Kate Bush to Lady Gaga as one of mutual respect for both, can only be taken in the somewhat visual sence...and if so it begs the question: Why follow product people that are promoted as being " something " because they have only succeeded in getting your attention by whatever nonmusical gimmicks they come up with? Kate Bush was and is still true to the radical artistic quest of finding new MUSICAL expressions ....to create new emotions, and remind us to think about what it means to be alive, and to LIVE. Madonna tested the waters way back, when she based her whole act on visuals, hype, and quite bland singing. It has been mostly downhill ever since as far as the above ground popular music scene. Even in the 80's there was a growing decrease in the number of quality artists male & female....as MTV hype began to really confuse people about what music can acheive. I am a guy, but even I am insulted by Lady Gaga, Gwen Stefani, Kate Hudson, Rihanna etc and fake guy artists too who seem to think if they just get their makeup right, and videos happening, and wall of sound reverb going ....we should support them? Dig alittle deeper, and you will find some amazing new music, such as Donald Fagen's " Morph the Cat ". Lets not support people basically ripping us off, and dulling our sences. Music is one of the most powerful arts, and Time is irrelevant to It. Just my opinion, but I do not even let Kate Bush off the hook, cause as an artist all creations are attempts. Ariel definitly had one CD'worth of NEW music on it, that was up to her standards she set (The Dreaming, Hounds of Love, Red Shoes, and also some cuts from each disc were too weak to be included. Compositionally, and creatively performance-wise, she is at least up there with the Beatles in making REAL musical statements. Kate Bush is the Chaka Khan of her genre....how about sticking to her musical message. Kvibe

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×